Warning (2): unserialize() [function.unserialize]: Extra data starting at offset 934 of 948 bytes [CORE/cake/libs/cache/file.php, line 190]
Warning (2): unserialize() [function.unserialize]: Extra data starting at offset 1104 of 2220 bytes [CORE/cake/libs/cache/file.php, line 190]
Warning (2): unserialize() [function.unserialize]: Extra data starting at offset 725 of 1462 bytes [CORE/cake/libs/cache/file.php, line 190]
Warning (2): unserialize() [function.unserialize]: Extra data starting at offset 680 of 1372 bytes [CORE/cake/libs/cache/file.php, line 190]
Warning (2): unserialize() [function.unserialize]: Extra data starting at offset 950 of 1912 bytes [CORE/cake/libs/cache/file.php, line 190]
Warning (2): unserialize() [function.unserialize]: Extra data starting at offset 1015 of 2042 bytes [CORE/cake/libs/cache/file.php, line 190]
Warning (2): unserialize() [function.unserialize]: Extra data starting at offset 940 of 1892 bytes [CORE/cake/libs/cache/file.php, line 190]
Warning (2): unserialize() [function.unserialize]: Extra data starting at offset 2763 of 2777 bytes [CORE/cake/libs/cache/file.php, line 190]
diaphanes

Nutzerkonto

Marco Meier: Response to Andrea B. Braidt
Response to Andrea B. Braidt
(S. 95 – 100)

Marco Meier

Response to Andrea B. Braidt

PDF, 6 Seiten, 0.0 MB

  • Wissen
  • Epistemologie
  • Wissenschaftsgeschichte
  • Interdisziplinarität

Meine Sprache
Deutsch

Aktuell ausgewählte Inhalte
Deutsch, Englisch, Französisch

Marco Meier

is a journalist and writer, based in Lucerne.
Hartmut von Sass (Hg.): Between / Beyond / Hybrid

Everyone calls for it, but no one knows what the subject matter of this call really is—transdisciplinarity. After a period in which it went from an academic invitation to a demand urgently to be fulfilled, the concept has recently been losing its pull. High time to approach the concept anew and in a new form.

 

This volume collects prominent voices in the debate on transdisciplinarity in a transdisciplinary manner. Its coincidence of content and form in presenting main papers and critical replies to them from a different discipline allows for a vivid discussion and new insights. These stylistically and thematically divergent contributions are linked by reservations about transdisciplinarity as an allround intellectual weapon and the conviction that its programmatic weight could be regained by approaching the subject from the margins—transdisciplinarity where it breaks down, fails, comes to an end. Unravelling transdisciplinarity’s contours by clarifying its limits.